afbe270181
Two changes: 1. structured-add-commands: The implicit note shorthand (kb "text") caused accidental note creation from mistyped commands. Replaced with explicit kb addnote <text> command. Root command reverts to standard Cobra behaviour. Updated examples, tests, SKILL.md, and specs. 2. split-readme-developer-docs: Moved build-from-source instructions, release process, API reference, and ROCm migration notes from README.md into a new DEVELOPER.md. README now links to DEVELOPER.md for dev workflows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.9 KiB
2.9 KiB
Requirement: DEVELOPER.md exists at repo root
The repository SHALL have a DEVELOPER.md file at the project root containing all developer-facing documentation.
Scenario: File exists
- WHEN a developer navigates to the repository root
- THEN a
DEVELOPER.mdfile SHALL be present
Requirement: DEVELOPER.md contains build-from-source instructions
DEVELOPER.md SHALL contain instructions for building both the engine and client from source.
Scenario: Engine build from source
- WHEN a developer reads DEVELOPER.md
- THEN it SHALL include instructions for starting the engine from source using compose files (both NVIDIA and ROCm)
Scenario: Client build from source
- WHEN a developer reads DEVELOPER.md
- THEN it SHALL include instructions for building the client binary from source using
make buildandmake all
Requirement: DEVELOPER.md contains release process
DEVELOPER.md SHALL document the release process for both client and engine, including release scripts, version bumping, and Docker image tagging.
Scenario: Client release documentation
- WHEN a developer reads DEVELOPER.md
- THEN it SHALL include
release-client.shusage with flag options (--gitea, --github, --minor, --no-increment, --dry-run)
Scenario: Engine release documentation
- WHEN a developer reads DEVELOPER.md
- THEN it SHALL include
release-engine.shusage with flag options and Docker image tag conventions
Scenario: Version checking
- WHEN a developer reads DEVELOPER.md
- THEN it SHALL include how to check client and engine versions
Requirement: DEVELOPER.md contains developer notes
DEVELOPER.md SHALL include any forward-looking developer notes such as migration plans or technical debt items.
Scenario: ROCm migration note
- WHEN a developer reads DEVELOPER.md
- THEN it SHALL include the ROCm runtime migration note about onnxruntime and MIGraphX
Requirement: README.md excludes developer-only content
README.md SHALL NOT contain build-from-source instructions, release processes, or developer-only notes.
Scenario: No from-source build steps in README
- WHEN a user reads README.md
- THEN there SHALL be no "From source" subsections under engine or client installation
Scenario: No release section in README
- WHEN a user reads README.md
- THEN there SHALL be no "Building and releasing" section
Scenario: No developer notes in README
- WHEN a user reads README.md
- THEN there SHALL be no "Future: ROCm runtime migration" section
Requirement: README.md cross-references DEVELOPER.md
README.md SHALL include a link to DEVELOPER.md for users who want to build from source or contribute.
Scenario: Developer link in quick start
- WHEN a user reads the Quick Start section of README.md
- THEN there SHALL be a note pointing to DEVELOPER.md for building from source