Files
pcli/openspec/changes/archive/2026-02-18-expand-board-included-parsing/design.md
T
Steve Cliff 7937266262 feat(status): add --project flag for filtering boards by project name
- Implemented the --project flag in the pcli status command to filter boards based on the specified project name.
- Updated the command to resolve project names to IDs using case-insensitive matching.
- Adjusted the totalBoards count in the output to reflect the number of boards matching the project filter.
- Enhanced command help text and README documentation to include usage examples for the new flag.
- Verified functionality through manual testing and ensured default behavior remains unchanged when the flag is omitted.

feat(board): expand GetBoard response to include labels and card associations

- Modified the Board struct to include Labels, CardLabels, and CardMemberships fields.
- Updated the GetBoard method to parse additional fields from the API response.
- Enhanced ListCardsByBoard to include label names for each card based on the enriched board data.
- Ensured backward compatibility by making new fields optional and preserving existing output structure.
2026-02-18 21:38:41 +00:00

38 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown

## Context
The Planka v2 API `GET /api/boards/:id` response includes an `included` object with: `users`, `boardMemberships`, `labels`, `lists`, `cards`, `cardMemberships`, `cardLabels`, `taskLists`, `tasks`, `attachments`, `customFieldGroups`, `customFields`, `customFieldValues`. Currently `GetBoard` only parses `lists` and `cards`, discarding everything else.
The `CardLabel` and `Label` types already exist in `model/types.go`. The `Board` struct has `Lists` and `Cards` fields but not `Labels`, `CardLabels`, or `CardMemberships`.
## Goals / Non-Goals
**Goals:**
- Parse `labels`, `cardLabels`, and `cardMemberships` from the `GetBoard` response
- Make label data available on the `Board` struct for downstream consumers
- Enrich `ListCardsByBoard` output so `card list --board` includes label names per card
**Non-Goals:**
- Parsing all included fields (users, taskLists, attachments, customFields, etc.) — only what's needed now
- Adding label data to `card list --list` (uses a different API endpoint that doesn't include labels)
- Changing the `card get` response (already returns card-level data via a different endpoint)
## Decisions
### Add fields to Board struct rather than creating a separate BoardDetail type
**Decision**: Add `Labels`, `CardLabels`, and `CardMemberships` as optional fields on the existing `Board` struct with `omitempty`.
**Alternative**: Create a `BoardDetail` struct for the enriched response. Rejected — the fields are simply absent when not fetched (e.g., `ListBoards`), and `omitempty` handles this cleanly without a type split.
### Add Labels field to CardWithList for card list --board output
**Decision**: Add a `Labels` field (`[]string` of label names) to the `CardWithList` struct. `ListCardsByBoard` will resolve card→label associations via the `cardLabels` join table and `labels` list from the board response.
**Alternative**: Return full `Label` objects per card. Rejected — label names are sufficient for display and filtering; full objects add noise to output.
### Use join-table approach matching the API structure
**Decision**: Keep `CardLabel` as the join entity (cardId + labelId), and resolve to label names at the point of use (in `ListCardsByBoard`). This mirrors the Planka API's relational structure.
## Risks / Trade-offs
- **[Additive JSON fields]** → `card list --board` output will include a new `labels` array per card. Existing consumers that don't use this field are unaffected. Scripts using strict JSON parsing may need updating.
- **[Partial included parsing]** → We still skip users, taskLists, attachments, etc. This is intentional — parse only what's needed. Future changes can add more fields incrementally.