steve
89537d417a
P5-01 — Documentation site under docs/book/ rendered with mdBook
(downloaded via Makefile, same static-binary pattern as Tailwind).
Structured chapters: getting started, concepts, operations,
security, reference. `make docs` / `make docs-watch`. Generated
output gitignored.
P5-02 — CONTRIBUTING.md rewritten from placeholder to a full
guide. CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md adapted from Contributor Covenant for a
single-maintainer project. .gitea/issue_template/{bug,feature}.md
and PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md.
P5-04 — Six README screenshots captured live from a fresh server
bootstrap (login, empty dashboard, add-host, alerts, settings,
audit log). README rewritten to centre the screenshot grid and
link out to the docs site.
P5-05 — SECURITY.md with disclosure policy (3-day ack, 30-day
default window), scope in/out, threat-model summary, operator
hardening checklist. Mirrored as a docs-site chapter.
P5-06 — End-to-end test harness. e2e/compose.e2e.yml brings up
server + sibling Linux agent (alpine + restic) + restic/rest-server.
Agent uses announce-and-approve so Playwright can drive the full
operator flow: bootstrap → login → accept pending → backup →
verify terminal status. Second spec scrapes /metrics to assert
the P6-04 endpoint surface. .gitea/workflows/e2e.yml runs on every
PR; local how-to in docs/e2e.md.
70 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
70 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
# Code of Conduct
|
|
|
|
restic-manager is a small project run by one person. This Code of
|
|
Conduct sets out the basic expectations for participating in the
|
|
project's issue tracker, pull requests, and any other community
|
|
spaces (chat, mailing lists) we may run in future.
|
|
|
|
## Expected behaviour
|
|
|
|
- **Be civil.** Disagreement is fine; rudeness is not. The same
|
|
comment can usually be made without making it personal.
|
|
- **Assume good faith.** People asking what feels like a basic
|
|
question may be new to the project. People proposing what feels
|
|
like a duplicate idea may not have seen the prior discussion.
|
|
Point them to the right place politely.
|
|
- **Stay on topic.** Issue threads are for the issue. Tangential
|
|
conversations belong in their own thread.
|
|
- **Acknowledge the project's scope.** restic-manager is
|
|
intentionally small in scope (see `spec.md` §2). Reasonable
|
|
feature suggestions may still be declined for fit reasons.
|
|
|
|
## Unacceptable behaviour
|
|
|
|
- Harassment, threats, or insults — public or private.
|
|
- Discriminatory comments based on age, body size, disability,
|
|
ethnicity, gender identity or expression, level of experience,
|
|
nationality, personal appearance, race, religion, sexual identity
|
|
or orientation.
|
|
- Sustained disruption — derailing threads, ignoring repeated
|
|
requests to take a discussion elsewhere, brigading.
|
|
- Publishing other people's private information without permission.
|
|
|
|
## Reporting
|
|
|
|
If someone in the project's spaces is behaving in a way that
|
|
breaches this Code of Conduct, contact the maintainer directly
|
|
through the contact details on their Gitea profile, or via the
|
|
private security disclosure path documented in
|
|
[SECURITY.md](./SECURITY.md). Reports stay confidential.
|
|
|
|
The maintainer will review the report, gather context if needed,
|
|
and respond. Possible outcomes include a private warning, a public
|
|
clarification of expectations, a temporary or permanent ban from
|
|
project spaces, or no action if the report doesn't hold up.
|
|
|
|
There is no formal appeals process — this is a one-person project,
|
|
not a foundation. If you think a decision was wrong you can say
|
|
so, in writing, to the maintainer; that's it.
|
|
|
|
## Scope
|
|
|
|
This Code of Conduct applies to interactions in any space the
|
|
project owns or operates: the Gitea repository (issues, pull
|
|
requests, discussions, wiki), any chat channels we publish, and
|
|
any conferences or events the project is officially represented at.
|
|
|
|
It does not apply to:
|
|
|
|
- Forks of the project that aren't being submitted back upstream.
|
|
- Conversations between contributors that don't reference the
|
|
project.
|
|
- Public criticism of the project itself.
|
|
|
|
## Acknowledgement
|
|
|
|
This document borrows shape and language from the
|
|
[Contributor Covenant](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/) v2.1
|
|
but is intentionally shorter and adapted to the project's
|
|
single-maintainer reality.
|